nanog mailing list archives
Re: guys != gender neutral
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:43:21 -0400
Given that this thread started out as a query re. a "really nasty attack," and resulted in:
5 on-topic responses (2 of which also commented on "guys") >20 responses re. "guys" (I stopped counting)It occurs to me that maybe "morons" or "idiots" might be an appropriate gender-neutral framing.
-- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
Current thread:
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif), (continued)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) John Levine (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Scott Howard (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Landon Stewart (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Bjørn Mork (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Eric Parsonage (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Simon Perreault (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Scott Noel-Hemming (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Joe Greco (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Tim Franklin (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Randy Bush (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Jamie Bowden (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Justin M. Streiner (Sep 28)