nanog mailing list archives
Re: guys != gender neutral
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:40:43 -0400
Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:43:21 -0400, Miles Fidelman said:Given that this thread started out as a query re. a "really nasty attack," and resulted in: 5 on-topic responses (2 of which also commented on "guys") >20 responses re. "guys" (I stopped counting) It occurs to me that maybe "morons" or "idiots" might be an appropriate gender-neutral framing.I usually use 'critters' for that. salescritters, congresscritters, trollcritters.
I'm kind of a fan of Greg House on this one. Or Mel Brooks, from Blazing Saddles: “They’re common people – the salt of the earth. You know – Morons”. :-)
-- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
Current thread:
- Re: guys != gender neutral, (continued)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Landon Stewart (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Bjørn Mork (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Eric Parsonage (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Simon Perreault (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Scott Noel-Hemming (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Joe Greco (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Tim Franklin (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Randy Bush (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Jamie Bowden (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Justin M. Streiner (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Keith Medcalf (Sep 29)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 30)