nanog mailing list archives
Re: guys & dolls (a film motif)
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 28 Sep 2012 03:58:32 -0000
I only wish you had used 'guys' instead of 'people' :)
Speciesist troglodyte.
Current thread:
- Re: guys != gender neutral, (continued)
- Re: guys != gender neutral William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jo Rhett (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jason Baugher (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Andrew D Kirch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Ray Van Dolson (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) bmanning (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) Andrew D Kirch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) bmanning (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) Andrew D Kirch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) Doug Barton (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) John Levine (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Scott Howard (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Landon Stewart (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Bjørn Mork (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Eric Parsonage (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Simon Perreault (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Scott Noel-Hemming (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Joe Greco (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)