nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 End User Fee
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 5 Aug 2012 16:00:18 -0000
Do you see problems with this scheme? There's considerable interest and momentum in end user owned routing infrastructure, including wireless ad hoc meshes across urban areas.
I've seen remarkably little overlap between the people that think ad hoc meshes are a fabulous liberating technology and the people who understand how they work and what their limitatations are. As a way to bring some sort of service to unserved areas, they're interesting. As a substitute for a real network, they're not. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Randy Bush (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Jimmy Hess (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 05)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee John Levine (Aug 05)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 05)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Randy Bush (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Aug 03)