nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 End User Fee
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen () leitl org>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 12:01:11 +0200
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 08:31:06PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
You MIGHT have paid some other organization for the privilege of transferring part or all of their registration rights to you. But in no case did you pay for the addresses themselves unless you are silly enough to think that a person can own an integer.
IPv6 missed a great chance of doing away with all the central waterfall trickle-down space distribution. Luckily, /64 looks like large enough to bypass that by offering address space sufficiently large while co-existable with legacy addressing and routing. I hope eventually somebody will start tinkering with mesh radios which also have GPS onboard (as most smartphones and tablets do). 24 + 24 + 16 bits are just enough to represent a decent-resolution WGS84 position fix. Plus, GPS gives you a pretty accurate clock.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Cameron Byrne (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Derek Ivey (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee George Herbert (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Derek Ivey (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee William Pitcock (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Seth Mattinen (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Jimmy Hess (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Randy Bush (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Jimmy Hess (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 05)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee John Levine (Aug 05)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 05)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Randy Bush (Aug 03)