nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 End User Fee
From: Dan Luedtke <mail () danrl de>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 09:18:56 +0200
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 14:22 -0500, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. wrote:
1. How are you making up loss of revenue on IPv4 assignments?
By using legacy IP only were it is necessary. This way I have to support only one stack (IPv6), that saves me money. Regards. Dan -- Dan Luedtke http://www.danrl.de
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Jimmy Hess (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 05)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee John Levine (Aug 05)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 05)