nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT444 or ?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:16:28 +0200
I'm going to have to deploy NAT444 with dual-stack real soon now.
you may want to review the presentations from last week's apnic meeting in busan. real mesurements. sufficiently scary that people who were heavily pushing nat444 for the last two years suddenly started to say "it was not me who pushed nat444, it was him!" as if none of us had a memory. randy
Current thread:
- NAT444 or ? Serge Vautour (Sep 01)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Cameron Byrne (Sep 01)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Douglas Otis (Sep 05)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Arturo Servin (Sep 06)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Tore Anderson (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Randy Bush (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Randy Bush (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Daniel Roesen (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Geoff Huston (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Seth Mos (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 08)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Dan Wing (Sep 08)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Dobbins, Roland (Sep 09)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Tore Anderson (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Cameron Byrne (Sep 01)