nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT444 or ?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:27:22 +0200
In a typical DS-Lite deployment you won't be using NAT444. One of the key advantages of DS-Lite (and A+P, I believe) is that there's only one level of NAT between the end user and the public internet.
yep. and in ds-lite that nat is in the core, so you talk to comcast's lawyers when you need a new alg. with a+p, the nat is under customer control, and they just go to best buy to get the cpe that supports the alg that they want. randy
Current thread:
- NAT444 or ? Serge Vautour (Sep 01)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Cameron Byrne (Sep 01)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Douglas Otis (Sep 05)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Arturo Servin (Sep 06)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Tore Anderson (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Randy Bush (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Randy Bush (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Daniel Roesen (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Geoff Huston (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Seth Mos (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 08)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Dan Wing (Sep 08)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Tore Anderson (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Cameron Byrne (Sep 01)