Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?

[Charles N Wyble <charles () knownelement com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

pfsense in redundant pair for routing/security/vlan termination
cisco all the way for l2 switching

On 01/10/2011 09:38 AM, James Smith wrote:
> All the places I've worked in the past decade have been all Cisco shops for
> routing and switching, with a lot of Cisco use for security too (firewalls
> and IDS).  Same with my current position, but we're switching to Juniper for
> all those product categories.  Same or better performance, but 10-20% less
> cost.  Additionally, I find the Juniper command line has more features that
> make operating and monitoring much more efficient.  Also, JunOS has only one
> development train which means that the commands I use work on every single
> Juniper platform.  It always bugs me when I’m trying to setup QOS across a
> network with different Cisco platforms (CatOS, ASA, different versions of
> IOS) and each platform has a completely different way of doing it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=c7OX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----