nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
From: Herro91 <herro91 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:01:40 -0500
From my experience - A key thing to consider from any vendor is their
support - Cisco has great support and a large support organization. I've seen them turn around complex problems very rapidly for their customers. Additionally, someone already mentioned investment protection and that Cisco keeps providing incremental improvements such that older 12000s are still up and running AND supported. When making an important purchase, these are among the top IMHO. HTH.... On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Chuck Anderson <cra () wpi edu> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:10:16PM -0800, Scott Weeks wrote:To be fair to Cisco and maybe I'm way off here. But it seems they do come out with a way to do things first which then become a standard that they have to follow. ISL/DOT1Q HSRP/VRRP etherchannel/LACPYes, and then they keep their proprietary implementation instead of phasing it out, and no one migrates to the standard one which leads to vendor lockin.
Current thread:
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?, (continued)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Seth Mattinen (Jan 11)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Ron Broersma (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Charles N Wyble (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chuck Anderson (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Herro91 (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Tony Varriale (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Tony Varriale (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chris Adams (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)