nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
From: "Tony Varriale" <tvarriale () comcast net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:04:38 -0600
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brandon Kim" <brandon.kim () brandontek com>To: <cra () wpi edu>; "nanog group" <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 8:46 AM Subject: RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
For ISL, I know they are trying to phase that out. For the exams, they are based on dot1q.....Even if I had all cisco equipment, I'd try to go with standards because you never know down the road where you mayneed to use another vendor. I wouldn't use EIGRP if given a choice, I'd go with OSPF or RIPv2.
The main problem with this is RIP sucks and there aren't a lot of people out there that are really good with OSPF. For every one legit design and implementation of OSPF, I've seen 50 with every thing in 0 and config statements everywhere.
For companies that don't have real dedicated networking people, EIGRP is much more easy to admin and troubleshoot.
tv
Current thread:
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?, (continued)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Seth Mattinen (Jan 11)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Ron Broersma (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? James Smith (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Charles N Wyble (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Joel M Snyder (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Scott Weeks (Jan 12)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chuck Anderson (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Herro91 (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Tony Varriale (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Tony Varriale (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chuck Anderson (Jan 13)
- Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chris Adams (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Scott Morris (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Magill (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chris Adams (Jan 13)