nanog mailing list archives
RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
From: Brandon Kim <brandon.kim () brandontek com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:23:39 -0500
For anyone that is following this thread/subject from yesterday, is it me or does it seem as if Cisco really isn't the choice for most SP's? Someone has mentioned that it all really depends on your needs and what it is you want to provide. IMO, every vendor has something they are good at. I wouldn't use Cisco for everything, nor Juniper etc etc... The concern I sense is that from Cisco's POV, it's their way or the highway. Not only do you pay a premium for smartnet, but if there's an issue, they are quick to point the finger. That is not service/support that I desire.... Is this what everyone is sensing as well? I'm starting to look at Brocade now just to do some fair comparisons.....
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:56:31 +0000 From: jethro.binks () strath ac uk To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Greg Whynott wrote:Just as a pointer - one of the largest and most utilized IX (AMS-IX) has their platform built on Brocade devices.Brocade device's pre Foundry purchase correct? I can't see anyone that large using Foundry in large deployments..Probably not as large as AMX-IX, but London Internet Exchange (LINX): both as Foundry and Brocade. Jethro. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jethro R Binks, Network Manager, Information Services Directorate, University Of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK The University of Strathclyde is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, number SC015263.
Current thread:
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?, (continued)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Donnelly (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? lorddoskias (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? b nickell (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Miquel van Smoorenburg (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jethro R Binks (Jan 11)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Seth Mattinen (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Donnelly (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Ron Broersma (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Charles N Wyble (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chuck Anderson (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Herro91 (Jan 13)