nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH CPE landscape
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:38:39 -0400
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 13:30:35 PDT, Owen DeLong said:
On Aug 4, 2011, at 8:35 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:- Generic consumer grade NAT/FirewallHobby horse: please make sure it support bridge mode? Those of us who want to put our own routers on the wire will hate you otherwise.Why? As long as it can be a transparent router, why would it need to be a bridge?
I must be having a senior moment, but what in the world is a "transparent router" and how is it different from running in bridged mode? (Note that if if it's transmogrifying the packets in some way, it's not really transparent, and if it's not, it's basically bridging...)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape, (continued)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape PC (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Scott Helms (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape PC (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Cutler James R (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Scott Helms (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Scott Helms (Aug 05)
- RE: FTTH CPE landscape Jamie Bowden (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Tom Hill (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Kenneth Ratliff (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- RE: FTTH CPE landscape Eric Wieling (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jason Lixfeld (Aug 04)