nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH CPE landscape
From: Scott Helms <khelms () ispalliance net>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:27:38 -0400
I was speaking from the service provider perspective. If I deploy CPE to a customer, I want it to be a router, not a bridge. Owen
Why? What is/are the technical or marketing reason(s) that make you want to deploy routers over bridges knowing that they are more expensive? For what kinds of customers? What kinds of access networks? How much do you want to spend on CPE gear? How much remote manageability? How much customer manageability? What about mass firmware upgrades, diagnostics, and other OSS functions? (AFAIK the only standards based option for management behind a router is TR-069).
-- Scott Helms Vice President of Technology ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum (678) 507-5000 -------------------------------- http://twitter.com/kscotthelms --------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape, (continued)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Dan Armstrong (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape PC (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Scott Helms (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape PC (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Cutler James R (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Scott Helms (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Scott Helms (Aug 05)
- RE: FTTH CPE landscape Jamie Bowden (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Tom Hill (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Kenneth Ratliff (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- RE: FTTH CPE landscape Eric Wieling (Aug 05)