nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH CPE landscape
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:47:18 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Owen DeLong" <owen () delong com>
It differs from a bridge in that *it requires a chunk of routable IP space to put behind it*, and a route to go there. For the specific situation I posited, a consumer connection, you can get a static IP, but you *will not* get routable space; you have to go to a business connection for that, at 2-4 times the cost.That really depends on the ISP, doesn't it?
Sure. If you'd prefer, substitute "large, consumer ISP -- on the order of Verizon DSL or Road Runner". Both of those have told me that in the past, and, these days, I don't think they're unrepresentative of the common case. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
Current thread:
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape, (continued)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Scott Helms (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Scott Helms (Aug 05)
- RE: FTTH CPE landscape Jamie Bowden (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Tom Hill (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Kenneth Ratliff (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- RE: FTTH CPE landscape Eric Wieling (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jason Lixfeld (Aug 04)