nanog mailing list archives
Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption
From: Franck Martin <franck () genius com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:51:06 +1200 (FJT)
So they can't run their own services from home and have to request premium connectivity from you? Beside the IPv4 scarcity mentality we have the Telco mentality to fight... Happy days still ahead... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Bates" <jbates () brightok net> To: sthaug () nethelp no Cc: nanog () nanog org Sent: Tuesday, 19 October, 2010 8:10:35 AM Subject: Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption On 10/18/2010 1:20 PM, sthaug () nethelp no wrote:
I still haven't seen any good argument for why residential users need /48s. No, I don't think "that makes all the address assignments the same size" is a particularly relevant or convincing argument. We're doing /56 for residential users, and have no plans to change this.
+1 This not only makes pop assignments easier, it gives a much larger prefix rotation pool. Don't start the flame on rotating prefixes being evil. It's my implementation to at least give customers some chance at prefix privacy. Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption, (continued)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Jack Bates (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Joel Jaeggli (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Joel Jaeggli (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption sthaug (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Jack Bates (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Franck Martin (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Jack Bates (Oct 18)
- RE: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Schiller, Heather A (HeatherSkanks) (Oct 19)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Jack Bates (Oct 19)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 19)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Lee (Oct 19)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Robert E. Seastrom (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Marshall Eubanks (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Robert E. Seastrom (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Mark Andrews (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 19)