nanog mailing list archives

Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption


From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:10:57 -0500

On 10/19/2010 11:53 AM, Schiller, Heather A (HeatherSkanks) wrote:
        HS: Where customers = spammers?  The only folks I have seen ask
to do 'address rotation' have either been spammers or copyright
monitoring services.  I have never seen a request for 'address rotation'
to protect a customer from Google.  Wouldn't you just tell them not to
use Google's services?  The *typical* residential user doesn't know and
probably doesn't care whether their prefix is dynamic or static.
        

The typical resident often doesn't know, but when asked, they do want privacy, and they don't want to be tracked by various databases for marketing or geoIP tracking. Some customers prefer static, but to date, the only reason customers have asked for static in v4 is because it was necessary. If v6 continues to support application and design for renumbering, such statics won't be necessary and I'll have even fewer requests.

        Dynamic allocation of address space was, in part, meant to help
conserve space - if the prefix was only needed for a couple hours, it
could in theory be released and reused... allowing more efficient
utilization of space.  Now though, with always-on connections and folks
wanting to access their content remotely - it makes sense to statically
allocate prefixes... and the availability of addresses in IPv6 gives us
the room to do this.

With the new capabilities of multiple prefixes and renumbering capabilities and the various methodologies which will be used to easily switch between providers (or balance traffic between multiple providers using multiple prefixes), rotating prefixes every 24 hours shouldn't be a big deal. The customer will still gain remote access to their content, while also remaining a moving target. Customer's care about privacy, even when they don't realize if they truly have it or not.

M$ considered privacy extensions on by default to be a good thing. I'm just extending it to the prefix. You can change nic cards as easily as you change ISPs (easier out here, actually). As customers actually notice or care that they are using v6, I'm sure I'll have more static requests as well, which we'll probably automate.


Jack


Current thread: