nanog mailing list archives
Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 18:21:30 +0100
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 17:58, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
It is always two bytes. A byte is not always an octet. Some machines do have byte sizes other than 8 bits
Vice versa. It's always two octects, but on some systems it may not be two bytes.
, although few of them are likely to have IPv6 stacks, so, this may be an academic distinction at this point.
Agreed. We can revisit this once we all own a few portable quantum computers, though :) Richard
Current thread:
- Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 18)
- RE: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming George Bonser (Nov 18)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming bmanning (Nov 18)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- RE: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming George Bonser (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming David Israel (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Joel Jaeggli (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming bmanning (Nov 18)
- RE: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming George Bonser (Nov 18)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming William Pitcock (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Cutler James R (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Scott Morris (Nov 22)