nanog mailing list archives
Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming
From: Scott Morris <swm () emanon com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:14:52 -0500
If 8 bits is a byte, then 16 bits should be a mouthful. ;) Scott On 11/18/10 10:45 PM, George Bonser wrote:
Hi all, as most of you are aware, there is no definite, canonical name for the two bytes of IPv6 addresses between colons. This forces people to use a description like I just did instead of a single, specific term.I am ok with "quibble" but I don't think it will gain wide usage in the US. We use "quad" at work. G
Current thread:
- RE: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming, (continued)
- RE: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming George Bonser (Nov 18)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming bmanning (Nov 18)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- RE: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming George Bonser (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming David Israel (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Joel Jaeggli (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming bmanning (Nov 18)
- RE: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming George Bonser (Nov 18)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming William Pitcock (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Cutler James R (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Scott Morris (Nov 22)