nanog mailing list archives

Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming


From: William Pitcock <nenolod () systeminplace net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:13:30 -0600

On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:06 +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 14:14, Scott Morris <swm () emanon com> wrote:

If 8 bits is a byte, then 16 bits should be a mouthful.

When does it become a meal and, more importantly, do you want to
supper (sic) size?


The supersize option offered by e.g. McDonalds is not much larger than
the normal meal size in my experience.

So I guess, 8 bits = small, 16 bits = meal, 24 bits = supersize or
something, but that doesn't fit well with IPv6 since each segment
between colons is only 16 bits.

We could call the :: part the 'liposection' though.

William



Current thread: