nanog mailing list archives
Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:57:56 +0100
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 07:00, <bmanning () vacation karoshi com> wrote:
problem is, its not alwas ggoig to be two bytes...
It's always two bytes, but people may choose to omit them. That is a social, not a (purely) technical, syntax, though. Richard
Current thread:
- Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 18)
- RE: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming George Bonser (Nov 18)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming bmanning (Nov 18)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- RE: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming George Bonser (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming David Israel (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Joel Jaeggli (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming bmanning (Nov 18)
- RE: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming George Bonser (Nov 18)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming William Pitcock (Nov 19)