nanog mailing list archives
Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today?
From: "Durand, Alain" <alain_durand () cable comcast com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 10:04:32 -0500
On 1/16/10 10:52 AM, "Cam Byrne" <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
A dual-stack capable host like windows 7 does not ensure any ipv6 network
access beyond the local LAN, especially given todays ipv4-only >service dominance. There are various ways to translate or tunnel to solve this problem, connecting v6 and v4 islands, including nat64 and ds-lite ===> Well, it all depends on which applications are in use. If the app running on the windows 7 side only works in IPv4 or if the app on the other side is only serving IPv4, there is little choice but to tunnel IPv4 over IPv6 in the middle. See, for many years, when we were thinking about IPv4/IPv6 transition, we looked at it a stack issue. I think we were missing something. We now have seen tons of IPv6 capable stacks (Win XP, Vista, 7, MacOS, Linux, Solaris,...) and still very little apps that take advantage of this, either on the client side, or on the content side. Just ask how many of the 100,000+ apps on the iPhone are IPv6 ready... Btw, on the content side, the situation is quite complex too, because it is not just about configuring apache for IPv6, this is about having a load balancing, content delivery, monitoring,... solution in place. What DS-lite gives you is the ability to de-couple the deployment of the network (including the host stacks) with IPv6 from the deployment of the applications with IPv6. I do believe there is a lot of value in this.
- Alain.
On 1/16/10 10:52 AM, "Cam Byrne" <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
A dual-stack capable host like windows 7 does not ensure any ipv6 network access beyond the local LAN, especially given todays ipv4-only service dominance. There are various ways to translate or tunnel to solve this problem, connecting v6 and v4 islands, including nat64 and ds-lite
Current thread:
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today?, (continued)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Jim Burwell (Jan 14)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Cameron Byrne (Jan 14)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Durand, Alain (Jan 15)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Jim Burwell (Jan 15)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Owen DeLong (Jan 15)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Jim Burwell (Jan 16)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Durand, Alain (Jan 17)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Cam Byrne (Jan 16)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Antonio Querubin (Jan 16)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Cam Byrne (Jan 16)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Durand, Alain (Jan 17)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Cameron Byrne (Jan 17)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Leo Bicknell (Jan 17)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Durand, Alain (Jan 17)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Cameron Byrne (Jan 14)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Durand, Alain (Jan 17)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Jim Burwell (Jan 14)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Jim Burwell (Jan 16)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Cameron Byrne (Jan 15)