nanog mailing list archives
Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today?
From: "Durand, Alain" <alain_durand () cable comcast com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:54:02 -0500
On 1/17/10 1:01 PM, "Leo Bicknell" <bicknell () ufp org> wrote: But, i am legitimately interested in perceived
service gaps or issues, given this tightly controlled service definition (web and email).I think the phones stopped being "tightly controlled" with the iPhone and Android phones. They expect generic IP connectivty, and are very much not web and e-mail only. Moreso than an IPv6 only provider, a web and e-mail only provider would probbaly find themselves at a huge disadvantage to a significant and growing segment of the market.
+1 I made a number of demonstration of mail and web service on an IPv6-only workstation back in early 2000, in my Solaris days. Even ten years ago, it was clear this would not be enough... - Alain.
Current thread:
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today?, (continued)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Jim Burwell (Jan 15)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Owen DeLong (Jan 15)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Jim Burwell (Jan 16)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Durand, Alain (Jan 17)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Cam Byrne (Jan 16)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Antonio Querubin (Jan 16)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Cam Byrne (Jan 16)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Durand, Alain (Jan 17)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Cameron Byrne (Jan 17)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Leo Bicknell (Jan 17)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Durand, Alain (Jan 17)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Durand, Alain (Jan 17)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Jim Burwell (Jan 16)
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Cameron Byrne (Jan 15)