nanog mailing list archives

RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons

From: "Randy Epstein" <nanog () hostleasing net>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:39:54 -0500

HE routes missing on Cogents side?


I would guess HE routes missing at Cogent and Cogent routes missing at HE.
Remember the cake?

http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Hurricane-Cake
.jpg

Or was that rectified?  Mahtan?

Randy

Current thread:

Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons, (continued)
- - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Scott Morris (Dec 21)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Hank Nussbacher (Dec 21)
  - RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk (Dec 21)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jared Mauch (Dec 21)
    - RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk (Dec 21)
    - RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Dec 21)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Mike Tancsa (Dec 21)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Mike Tancsa (Dec 21)
    - RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk - iName.com (Dec 21)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons ML (Dec 21)
    - RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Randy Epstein (Dec 21)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Seth Mattinen (Dec 21)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Dec 21)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jeff Wheeler (Dec 21)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Pekka Savola (Dec 21)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jeff Wheeler (Dec 22)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Bjoern A. Zeeb (Dec 22)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Pekka Savola (Dec 22)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jared Mauch (Dec 22)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Owen DeLong (Dec 22)
    - Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Seth Mattinen (Dec 23)

(Thread continues...)