nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:51:02 -0500
Not sure what route-server you are speaking of, but a quick peek at what we send on a customer session I see: NTT (2914) sends 3868 prefixes. If the route server contacts me in private, we can likely set up a view from 2914 or 2914-customer perspective. - Jared On Dec 21, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
There are 4,035 routes in the global IPv6 routing table. This is what one provider passed on to me for routes (/48 or larger prefixes), extracted from public route-view servers. AT&T AS7018: 2,851 (70.7%) Cogent AS174: 2,864 (71.0%) GLBX AS3549: 3,706 (91.8%) Hurricane Electric AS6939: 3,790 (93.9%) Qwest AS209: 3,918 (97.1%) TINET (formerly Tiscali) AS3257: 3,825 (94.8%) Verizon AS701: 3,938 (97.6%) Frank -----Original Message----- From: Bryan Fields [mailto:Bryan () bryanfields net] Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 12:56 PM To: NANOG list Subject: Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons On 12/21/2010 11:32, Frank Bulk wrote:A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that hadmadea comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different operators (i.e. HE, Cogent, Sprint, etc), making the point that a full view might takemultiplefeeds. I think that website also had text files with the comparisons.Whip yours out and lets have an on list comparison of table sizes :-D -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice 727-214-2508 - Fax http://bryanfields.net
Current thread:
- IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jared Mauch (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Kevin Loch (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Bryan Fields (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Scott Morris (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Hank Nussbacher (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jared Mauch (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Scott Morris (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Mike Tancsa (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Mike Tancsa (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk - iName.com (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jared Mauch (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons ML (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Randy Epstein (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Seth Mattinen (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jeff Wheeler (Dec 21)