nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons


From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:51:02 -0500

Not sure what route-server you are speaking of, but a quick peek at what we send on a customer session I see:

NTT (2914) sends 3868 prefixes.

If the route server contacts me in private, we can likely set up a view from 2914 or 2914-customer perspective.

- Jared

On Dec 21, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:

There are 4,035 routes in the global IPv6 routing table.  This is what one
provider passed on to me for routes (/48 or larger prefixes), extracted from
public route-view servers.
      AT&T AS7018: 2,851 (70.7%)
      Cogent AS174: 2,864 (71.0%)
      GLBX AS3549: 3,706 (91.8%)
      Hurricane Electric AS6939: 3,790 (93.9%)
      Qwest AS209: 3,918 (97.1%)
      TINET (formerly Tiscali) AS3257: 3,825 (94.8%)
      Verizon AS701: 3,938 (97.6%)

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Fields [mailto:Bryan () bryanfields net] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 12:56 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons

On 12/21/2010 11:32, Frank Bulk wrote:
A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that had
made
a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different operators (i.e. HE,
Cogent, Sprint, etc), making the point that a full view might take
multiple
feeds.  I think that website also had text files with the comparisons.

Whip yours out and lets have an on list comparison of table sizes

:-D
-- 
Bryan Fields

727-409-1194 - Voice
727-214-2508 - Fax
http://bryanfields.net






Current thread: