nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons


From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:29:20 +0200

At 14:01 21/12/2010 -0500, Scott Morris wrote:

Actually it depends on the # of route injects and withdrawls.

Sorry, couldn't help myself.

-Hank

   Size doesn't matter.  It's how well you use it.
   Route it, baby...
   ;)

   On 12/21/10 1:56 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:

On 12/21/2010 11:32, Frank Bulk wrote:

A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that had made
a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different operators (i.e. HE,
Cogent, Sprint, etc), making the point that a full view might take multiple
feeds.  I think that website also had text files with the comparisons.

Whip yours out and lets have an on list comparison of table sizes

:-D



Current thread: