nanog mailing list archives

RE: ISP customer assignments


From: "Lee Howard" <lee () asgard org>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:29:50 -0400

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert.E.VanOrmer () frb gov [mailto:Robert.E.VanOrmer () frb gov]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 7:41 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: ISP customer assignments

Organizations will be provided /48s or smaller, but given the current
issues with routing /48's globally, I think you will find more
organizations fighting for /32s or smaller... 

Most organizations will still be assigned a /48 (or whatever) from their
ISP.  Provider-aggregable addressing has no routing scalability problems.


I can see between IPv4 and IPv6 is how much of a pain it is to type a 128
bit address...  

I have to agree, here.  Moving between letters and numbers, and having 
to hit "shift" to use the colon wastes valuable keystrokes compared to 
the keypad.  However, compare IPv6 vs IPv4-like numbering:

2001:db8:f1::1          
81.93.35.12.241.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1

Did I type the right number of zeroes?


Lee



Current thread: