nanog mailing list archives
Re: The real issue
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:43:50 -0500
Shane Ronan wrote:
No, but they can sure send them a bill and then go after them for collections when they don't pay it.
1) I don't care to pay higher member fees because ARIN has been going to court left and right.
2) ARIN membership hasn't voted for such, because they probably didn't want to pay higher fees.
3) Some of the "legacy" networks are the richest and meanest networks on the planet, and you can't go after the little guys without taking the big guys to court; you'll lose.
4) Join the ARIN mailing list for the lengthy boring discussion, and read their long archives that probably have touched all these points and actually are on topic.
5) If ARIN convinces people to blackhole your routes due to non-payment, this might be a list to discuss it on; though I doubt it.
-Jack
Current thread:
- The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Jack Bates (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Mike Lewinski (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Jon Lewis (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Crooks, Sam (Apr 21)
- IPv6-capable hardware? Jack Bates (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Jon Lewis (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)