Re: The real issue

[Shane Ronan <sronan () fattoc com>]

Very simple, just do it.

On Apr 21, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Shane Ronan <sronan () fattoc com>  
> wrote:
> > It's means one of two things:
>
> sure, but 'how' exactly?
>
> > 1) Recoup the unused space for paid reallocation
> > or
>
> arin never (nor do any RIR) guarantee routability, nor do they even a
> method to affect routability of a network.
>
> > 2) Have the current "owner" pay the market rate for the IP space
>
> ... that's somewhat hard since the current policies don't support
> that, and there is no real legal stance for legacy-allocations... For
> allocated post-legacy-times ARIN can start court proceedings, but ...
> that's a lengthy process and expensive.
>
> -Chris
>
> > On Apr 21, 2009, at 7:37 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Shane Ronan <sronan () fattoc com>  
> > > wrote:
> > > > Is ARIN, who won't even take back large blocks of space from  
> > > > people who
> > > > have
> > > > long ago stopped using it and aren't paying anything for it,  
> > > > prepared to
> > > > start filing civil suits against people who were assigned /24's  
> > > > (and paid
> > > > for them) due to inaccurate declaration?
> > >
> > > out of curiousity.. 'take back' means what in this context?
>
> <div><br></div>