nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 21:14:29 +1200
On 2/06/2007, at 4:42 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
the average number of v4 prefixes per AS is ~10, and it's rising. In v6, the goal is that every PI site can use a single prefix**, meaning the v6 routing table will be at least one (and two or even three eventually) orders of magnitude smaller than the v4 one.how much of the v4 prefix count is de-aggregation for te or by TWits? why won't they do this in v6?
See slide 24 of:http://www.2007.apricot.net/presentation/apia-future-routing/apia- future-routing-vince-fuller.pdf
nearby slides are interesting, too. -- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Kradorex Xeron (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Joel Jaeggli (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Petri Helenius (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Stephen Sprunk (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Donald Stahl (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Simon Leinen (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Chris Owen (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Stephen Satchell (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jun 04)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Donald Stahl (Jun 04)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 04)