nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT Multihoming
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:02:52 +0200
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 07:33:45PM -0700, Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net> wrote a message of 29 lines which said:
The last time I renumbered, I found that quite a few people were not honoring the TTLs I put in my DNS zone files. [...] Custom customer zone files hosted elsewhere?
Do not forget that applications have their own caches, too, and they typically ignore completely the DNS TTL. A typical Web brower calls getaddrinfo() once and use the IP address as long as it is not restarted.
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (Jun 02)
- NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Lamar Owen (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Donald Stahl (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Simon Leinen (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Chris Owen (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Stephen Satchell (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jun 04)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Donald Stahl (Jun 04)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 04)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Donald Stahl (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Igor Gashinsky (Jun 03)
- IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Igor Gashinsky (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (Jun 03)