nanog mailing list archives

Re: NAT Multihoming

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:02:08 -0700

You write "when" rather than "if" - is ignoring reasonable TTLs
current practice?

Definitely.  We've seen 15 minute TTLs regularly go 48 hours without
updating on Cox or Comcast's name servers.  I believe the most I've seen
was 8 days (Cox).


i wish all my competitors did that.

randy

Current thread:

Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- - - Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
    - Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Stephen Sprunk (Jun 01)
    - Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 02)
    - Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 04)
    - Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (Jun 02)
- NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Lamar Owen (Jun 02)
  - Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
  - Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Donald Stahl (Jun 02)
    - Re: NAT Multihoming Simon Leinen (Jun 03)
    - Re: NAT Multihoming Chris Owen (Jun 03)
    - Re: NAT Multihoming Randy Bush (Jun 03)
    - Re: NAT Multihoming Stephen Satchell (Jun 03)
    - Re: NAT Multihoming Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jun 04)
    - Re: NAT Multihoming Donald Stahl (Jun 04)
    - Re: NAT Multihoming Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 04)
    - Re: NAT Multihoming Donald Stahl (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Igor Gashinsky (Jun 03)
  - Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 03)
    - Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Igor Gashinsky (Jun 03)
    - IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (Jun 03)
    - Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jun 03)

(Thread continues...)