nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: Kradorex Xeron <admin () digibase ca>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 03:31:17 -0400
On Saturday 02 June 2007 01:09, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Randy Bush wrote:how much of the v4 prefix count is de-aggregation for te or by TWits? why won't they do this in v6?wee, lookie! redistribute connectedwhee! lookie! minds disconnected, at least from public good.Yes :( sadly I suspect that is not the only mistake/misconfig/malconfig happening in the world :(
Doesn't everything that require a configuration have someone who eventually screws it up? :P It's a case of Murphy's law - If something can go wrong, it will - You just have to deal with the result and recover gracefully.
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Vince Fuller (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Stephen Sprunk (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Kradorex Xeron (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Joel Jaeggli (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Petri Helenius (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Stephen Sprunk (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (Jun 02)