nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 07:14:02 -0700
Kradorex Xeron wrote:
On Saturday 02 June 2007 01:09, Chris L. Morrow wrote:On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Randy Bush wrote:how much of the v4 prefix count is de-aggregation for te or by TWits? why won't they do this in v6?wee, lookie! redistribute connectedwhee! lookie! minds disconnected, at least from public good.Yes :( sadly I suspect that is not the only mistake/misconfig/malconfig happening in the world :(Doesn't everything that require a configuration have someone who eventually screws it up? :P
yes. and with ula-c, it's exactly the same as pi. except there is one advantage, ula-c relies on the router vendor to fill in the prefix. you still have to choose the interface to which to apply it (think two external upstreams and five site links). randy
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Vince Fuller (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Stephen Sprunk (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Kradorex Xeron (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Joel Jaeggli (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Petri Helenius (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Stephen Sprunk (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Paul Vixie (Jun 02)