RE: IPv6 news

["Church, Chuck" <cchurch () netcogov com>]

> If that is devising some sort of NAT for the large percentage of
> customers that don't care, then that may be the direction we need to
take.

Doesn't NAT-PT do just this?  If I'm an ISP with a million customers, if
I can use NAT-PT along with a IPV4 block of say /13, that seems like a
win.  V4-mapped and V4-Compatible V6 addresses were created for this
purpose, weren't they?

Chuck