nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:06:30 +0200
Brandon Ross <bross () internap com> writes:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 Michael.Dillon () btradianz com wrote:I'm sure that there will be a frantic scramble, but I don't expect it to last long enough for an IPv4 black market to form.There's already a black market in IPv4. I've seen plenty of offers to "buy" address space through various underhanded schemes. Most take the form of creating a shell company that the space is registered to and then the buyer "acquiring" that company.
The most impressive such deal I know about took place already in 1995 when IBM bought a small norwegian company called "Norsk informasjonsteknologi" (or NIT). Most people didn't see anything interesting there. But I guess IBM noticed they "owned" 32/8. Probably don't qualify for the black market though. It was more of a grey deal. Bjørn
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Stephen Sprunk (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael Greb (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news David Conrad (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Brandon Ross (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Bjørn Mork (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Geoff Huston (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Jeroen Massar (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)