nanog mailing list archives
Re: Regulatory intervention
From: Robert E.Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 13:09:22 -0400
Daniel Golding <dgolding () burtongroup com> writes:
On 10/7/05 11:02 AM, "Ross Hosman" <rosshosman () yahoo com> wrote:Google Goes to Washington One of the issues Google will tackle has become news this week: Level 3 and Cogent Communications are involved in a spat that has made Web sites on each network inaccessible or very slow to users on the opposite network. Google said the government has a responsibility to monitor the Internet so events like this do not occur. http://www.betanews.com/article/Google_Goes_to_Washington/1128691070Google also has a responsibility not to bite the hand that feeds it - the laise faire, unregulated Internet. Shame on them. Google is not suffering at all from this.
"Don't be evil" surrenders. Film at 11. ---Rob
Current thread:
- Re: Regulatory intervention, (continued)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Michael . Dillon (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Tom Vest (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Ross Hosman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Todd Vierling (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Erik Haagsman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Joel Rowbottom (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Todd Vierling (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Erik Haagsman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Ross Hosman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Daniel Golding (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Robert E . Seastrom (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Sean Donelan (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Henry Linneweh (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Erik Haagsman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Owen DeLong (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Michael . Dillon (Oct 10)
- Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) Erik Haagsman (Oct 07)