nanog mailing list archives
Re: Regulatory intervention
From: Joel Rowbottom <joel () jml net>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 16:49:46 +0100
At 16:26 07/10/2005, Erik Haagsman wrote:
> Google will also push for laws that make ISPs and intermediaries liable for > the content contained on their servers. > Well, isn't that "fun"? Ahhh....they feel they shouldn't sensor, and there I was thinking that was Google's task in life. Very generous and what a great idea for new laws that firmly put the blame on anyone but Google.
...and how does that affect Google caching? ;)
Current thread:
- Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?), (continued)
- Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) William Allen Simpson (Oct 06)
- Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) Hank Nussbacher (Oct 06)
- Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) Erik Haagsman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) William Allen Simpson (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) Erik Haagsman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Michael . Dillon (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Tom Vest (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Ross Hosman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Todd Vierling (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Erik Haagsman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Joel Rowbottom (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Todd Vierling (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Erik Haagsman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Ross Hosman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Daniel Golding (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Robert E . Seastrom (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Sean Donelan (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Henry Linneweh (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Erik Haagsman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Owen DeLong (Oct 07)