nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 09:42:35 -1000
Should undeliverable email (5.1.1, User unknown) be directed to /dev/null rather than responded to?
one current fashion is to try to catch it as early in the smtp receipt process as possible and reject the mail to the smtp sender. this gives the rejection to the real source as opposed to the joe job name. randy
Current thread:
- OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Adi Linden (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Pekka Savola (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Eric A. Hall (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Tony Finch (Jul 06)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Randy Bush (Jul 05)