nanog mailing list archives

Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]]


From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:01:32 +0100


On 22-nov-04, at 19:48, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:

        you might look at Apple,

To pick just one example, here is what AS714 is sourcing:

   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* i17.0.0.0/9 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 2914 12182 714 i * i17.0.0.0 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 2914 12182 714 i
* i17.64.0.0/12     15.69.14.160  4294967294    120      0 65466 714 i
* i17.72.0.0/16     15.69.44.160  4294967294    120      0 65466 714 i
* i17.81.0.0/16 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 3320 4628 714 i * i17.82.0.0/16 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 3320 4628 714 i * i17.83.0.0/16 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 3356 3356 3356 3356 3356 2915 714 i * i17.84.0.0/16 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 3320 4628 714 i * i17.86.0.0/16 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 1239 4648 2764 714 i * i17.87.0.0/16 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 3320 4628 714 i * i17.106.0.0/15 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 7018 714 i * i17.112.0.0/16 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 7018 714 i * i17.128.0.0/9 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 2914 12182 714 i * i17.251.0.0/16 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 2914 12182 714 i * i17.252.65.0/24 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 7018 714 i * i17.254.0.0/22 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 2914 12182 714 i * i192.35.50.0 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 2914 12182 714 i * i198.183.16.0 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 2914 12182 714 i * i198.183.17.0 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 2914 12182 714 i * i203.14.177.0 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 1239 4648 2764 714 i * i203.24.95.0 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 1239 4648 2764 714 i * i205.180.175.0 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 2914 12182 714 i

If all active ASes did this we'd have a 400k routing table. So please no PI in IPv6, not even for large enterprises.


Current thread: