nanog mailing list archives
Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]]
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 23 Nov 2004 01:29:42 +0000
To pick just one example, here is what AS714 is sourcing: Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * i17.0.0.0/9 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 2914 12182 714 i * i17.0.0.0 8.21.82.85 80 110 0 65453 2914 12182 714 i ... If all active ASes did this we'd have a 400k routing table. So please no PI in IPv6, not even for large enterprises.
i don't think that's a realistic proposition unless you intend ford and wal-mart and others with big enterprise-wide ip networks to use NAT when connecting their desktops. some of these people use direct peering in addition to transit-provider-of-the-month, and that's a good model for overall internet growth and robustness. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]], (continued)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 21)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Pekka Savola (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Pekka Savola (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Owen DeLong (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Paul Vixie (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Paul Vixie (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 23)
- Level 3 NOC information. Majid Farid (Nov 23)
- Re: Level 3 NOC information. Todd Mitchell - lists (Nov 23)
- Re: Level 3 NOC information. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 23)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Paul Vixie (Nov 23)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] William Allen Simpson (Nov 24)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 Paul Vixie (Nov 24)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 Jeroen Massar (Nov 24)