nanog mailing list archives
Re: istop arrogance
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph () istop com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 11:17:57 -0400 (EDT)
Because you could *gasp* be intelligent with your network design and do things like purchase transit from the same carriers in both your serving markets.I guess you don't consider redundancy to be intelligent. I do. I guess you can call me stupid.Carriers is a plural word.. How does that not accomplish redundancy again?
As I pointed out in my last post, I can't. And even if I could the economics of doing it don't make sense. If economics don't matter, then the most intelligent network design would be a redundant OC192 mesh, but I don't know even one network that does that. -Ralph
Current thread:
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance], (continued)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance] C. Jon Larsen (Jul 27)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls Paul Schultz (Jul 27)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls Brad Knowles (Jul 27)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls Andy Dills (Jul 27)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance] C. Jon Larsen (Jul 27)
- Re: verio arrogance Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 26)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Paul Schultz (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Paul Schultz (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: verio arrogance up (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 18)
- RE: verio arrogance Daniel Golding (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Peter E. Fry (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Kai Schlichting (Jul 18)
- RE: verio arrogance Phil Rosenthal (Jul 18)