nanog mailing list archives

Re: verio arrogance


From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph () istop com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 16:27:50 -0400 (EDT)


On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:

And your suggestion has technical deficiencies as well.  I have a leased
line between Toronto and Ottawa, so I want to announce my Ottawa IPs to my
Toronto transit provider as well as an Ottawa transit provider.  And the
reverse for the Toronto IPs.  My understand is trying to punch holes in PA
space is much more difficult than de-aggregating ARIN PI space.

I can't really see why, as long as the provider has punched the
appropriate hole for your aggregate in their filters.  More specific
routes always win out.  Or am I missing your point?

If the block isn't assigned to you by ARIN, I've encountered cases where
network operators request an LOA before accepting the announcement, even
if there is an RADB entry for it.  As well, if you have PA space and your
upstream allocates you a 66.x for example, then you're back to square one.

-Ralph



Current thread: