nanog mailing list archives

RE: AT&T NYC


From: "Robert A. Hayden" <rhayden () geek net>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:53:08 -0500 (CDT)


Yup.  I like using OSPF to set up the mesh to the loopbacks and then ibgp
as the IGP.

On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Michael Hallgren wrote:

Um.  Set up more than one reflector....

yes... and align your setup with your physical topology(so making it
useful);
use other proto for mapping your infra, etc, etc,..

mh

On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Peter van Dijk wrote:

On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:09:54PM -0400, alex () yuriev com wrote:
Has anybody mentioned the benefits of ISIS as an IGP to them.
Link-state protocols are evil, and when they break, they *really*
break.
I still do not see a compeling argument for not using BGP as your IGP.

Slow convergence.

As well there is the issues of running a full iBGP mesh.  I've actually
been doing it, and now that I'm about o add my 5th router, OSPF is
looking a lot better than configuring 4 more BGP sessions.  I've heard
some people recommend a route-reflector, but that would mean if the
route-reflector goes down you're screwed.

-Ralph










Current thread: