nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T NYC
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <rhayden () geek net>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:36:44 -0500 (CDT)
Um. Set up more than one reflector.... On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Peter van Dijk wrote:On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:09:54PM -0400, alex () yuriev com wrote:Has anybody mentioned the benefits of ISIS as an IGP to them.Link-state protocols are evil, and when they break, they *really* break. I still do not see a compeling argument for not using BGP as your IGP.Slow convergence.As well there is the issues of running a full iBGP mesh. I've actually been doing it, and now that I'm about to add my 5th router, OSPF is looking a lot better than configuring 4 more BGP sessions. I've heard some people recommend a route-reflector, but that would mean if the route-reflector goes down you're screwed. -Ralph
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- Re: AT&T NYC Petri Helenius (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Daniel Golding (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC NAIDOO Kesva FTLD/IAP (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Brian Wallingford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Peter van Dijk (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Chris Woodfield (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld (Aug 29)
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ross Chandler (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Kurtis Lindqvist (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)