nanog mailing list archives
RE: AT&T NYC
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:53:27 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 alex () yuriev com wrote:
I would definately not recommend route reflection or a confederation in a network with such a small number of BGP routers:
In spirit of the above, I suggest you also do not have maintenance window, forget about re-checking configs, enable to do the simpliest commands, and of course let everyone try debugging any problems by typing random commands into your routers. After all, your network consists of only 4 routers.
Ok, but how is _not_ using route reflection or a confederation similar to the above??? Iljitsch
Current thread:
- RE: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- RE: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC William Waites (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Mark Kent (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Daniel Golding (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Dmitri Krioukov (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)