nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting )
From: Ross Chandler <ross () eircom net>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:36:25 +0100
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Robert A. Hayden wrote:Um. Set up more than one reflector....So how many is enough? I would think 3 is a minimum to come close to the reliability/redundancy of OSPF. -Ralph
My two cents..BGP beats OSPF in the reliability stakes easily in my experience. I'd put as little as possible (loopbacks/internal links only) into OSPF. Two (or more)
BGP route reflectors deployed to reflect the physical topology/area structure is explicitly redundant in a way that OSPF isn't. Ross
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- Re: AT&T NYC Peter van Dijk (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Chris Woodfield (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld (Aug 29)
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ross Chandler (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Kurtis Lindqvist (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC William Waites (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Mark Kent (Aug 29)