nanog mailing list archives
Re: a question about the economics of peering
From: Arman <arman () unitedlayer com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:00:36 -0800
Daniel Golding wrote:
.....
Hmm. Congested public exchange points were a reality at some point in the past. They are now a recurrent myth, thanks to the demise of FDDI EPs and the rise of GigE EPs. There is little congestion, at this point. Of course, this could be because most Internet traffic is exchanged over private peering. I think that most clued folks are largely uninterested in hop-count. Latency is much more important.
that depends on your primary application, latency is not important for streaming or downloads. ak
Current thread:
- Re: a question about the economics of peering, (continued)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Giles Heron (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Sean Donelan (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Alex Rubenstein (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering batz (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Nigel Titley (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Neil J. McRae (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Chrisy Luke (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Alex Rubenstein (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Giles Heron (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Vadim Antonov (Nov 30)
- RE: a question about the economics of peering Daniel Golding (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Arman (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Jon Mansey (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Alex Rubenstein (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Randy Bush (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering up (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Chrisy Luke (Nov 30)