nanog mailing list archives
Re: a question about the economics of peering
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:44:44 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Giles Heron wrote:
but what if the *unnamed-ethernet-extension-company* wasn't providing access to public exchange points, but was rather enabling uncongested private peering over its network? That way latency and hop count are both mimimised.
Net99
Current thread:
- a question about the economics of peering Alex Rubenstein (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering David R. Dick (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Giles Heron (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Sean Donelan (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Alex Rubenstein (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering batz (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Nigel Titley (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Neil J. McRae (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Chrisy Luke (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Alex Rubenstein (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Giles Heron (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Vadim Antonov (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering David R. Dick (Nov 30)
- RE: a question about the economics of peering Daniel Golding (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Arman (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Jon Mansey (Nov 30)