nanog mailing list archives
RE: a question about the economics of peering
From: "Daniel Golding" <dgolding () sockeye com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:47:30 -0500
Today, I was approached by *unnamed-ethernet-extension-company*. They extend ethernets between several US and UK peering exchanges. While speaking with them today, thier engineer and I got into alittle bitof a disagreement as to why people peer with each other atpublic exchangepoints. My belief is that generally speaking, networks meet at public exchange points (such as MAE-*, LINX, AMSIX, AADS, etc) is to exchange traffic with each other more economically (read: save money). His belief is that people will pay a premium to get to anexchange point,because it's worth paying a premium to have 'less hops' between two networks.The problem with this idea is that public exchange points need to be *avoided* when they get too congested. People may start out trying to minimize number of hops, but I think they eventually try to minimize total latency.
Hmm. Congested public exchange points were a reality at some point in the past. They are now a recurrent myth, thanks to the demise of FDDI EPs and the rise of GigE EPs. There is little congestion, at this point. Of course, this could be because most Internet traffic is exchanged over private peering. I think that most clued folks are largely uninterested in hop-count. Latency is much more important. - Daniel Golding
Essentially, he said that paying more for peering that for transit is typical, and to be expected, and most people accept this. Whats the common opinion on this?
Current thread:
- Re: a question about the economics of peering, (continued)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering David R. Dick (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Giles Heron (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Sean Donelan (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Alex Rubenstein (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering batz (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Nigel Titley (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Neil J. McRae (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Chrisy Luke (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Alex Rubenstein (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Giles Heron (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Vadim Antonov (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering David R. Dick (Nov 30)
- RE: a question about the economics of peering Daniel Golding (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Arman (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Jon Mansey (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Alex Rubenstein (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Randy Bush (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering up (Nov 30)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Chrisy Luke (Nov 30)